The cost that never appears on any statement, and the one that matters most.
There is a number circulating in the rooms where these conversations happen. Not the $84 trillion projected to transfer between generations by 2045 — that figure is familiar to everyone in this space, and it rightly commands attention. It is the foundation of serious succession planning, the lens through which family offices are restructuring their mandates, the context for some of the most consequential governance work being done today.
The number worth sitting with is smaller. And it cuts closer.
$14.7 trillion.
That is the estimated value — drawn from decades of family governance research — consumed not by market cycles, not by regulatory pressure, not by geopolitical misalignment, but by the internal dynamics of the families that hold the wealth. Unresolved tensions between generations. Decisions avoided until they become fractures. Governance structures built with care and dismantled by the weight of what was never said. Successors who were prepared financially, and unprepared for everything else.
Fourteen point seven trillion dollars. Not lost. Consumed. From within.
In some circles, this has begun to be called the Global Ego Tax. Not as a judgment — no one who works closely with these families would use the word lightly — but as a precise description of a systemic dynamic that the industry has named in fragments for years, and never quite confronted whole.
The Julius Baer Family Barometer 2025 — drawn from nearly 2,500 experts advising UHNW families across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America — confirms what those of us working in this space observe daily. The top concerns of ultra-high-net-worth families are not financial. They are succession planning, individual and family growth, and building family legacy. Human questions. Questions of purpose, identity, and alignment across people who carry very different relationships to what has been built.
The professionals understand this. The tools do not yet address it.
Only 28.6 per cent of UHNW families surveyed report a clearly defined and unanimously shared vision and mission. The majority describe their alignment as partial — managed conversation by conversation, year by year. This is not a failure of these families. It is a structural absence. There is no layer, no system, no operating infrastructure designed to support the clarity that must precede governance — not document it after the fact, but actively support it as decisions are being formed.
What the industry has built, and built extraordinarily well, is the financial layer. The structures, the mandates, the jurisdictional architecture, the succession vehicles. These are essential. They are also, by design, downstream of the moment that determines whether any of it holds.
The $14.7 trillion is lost upstream. Before the notary appointment. Before the family council convenes. In the space between what people understand and what they have never been given the conditions to say.
Those entering stewardship now are navigating a transition that has no direct precedent — not because the stakes are higher, but because the question has changed.
Previous generations inherited a role and learned to inhabit it. The current generation inherits a role and asks, with genuine seriousness, what it is for. What does it mean to govern capital of this scale in a world of this complexity? What are the responsibilities that come with it, not legally, but humanly? How does one hold something this significant without being consumed by it?
These are not questions of weakness. They are questions of depth — and they are precisely the questions that determine whether a transition becomes a transformation or a fracture.
The Julius Baer data captures the shape of this shift: more than 80 per cent of UHNW families now have members across multiple countries, nearly a third hold physical assets in three or more jurisdictions, and the governance conversations increasingly span five living generations simultaneously. The structural complexity is unprecedented. But the deeper challenge is not jurisdictional. It is coherence — the shared understanding, across all those generations and geographies, of what the family is actually doing and why.
The families we have worked alongside over the years — and the conversations that stay with us — share a common pattern. The ones that navigate transition well are not the ones with the most sophisticated structures, though they often have those too. They are the ones where clarity was established before the pressure arrived. Where the next generation understood not just what they were receiving, but what they were being asked to become. Where the conversation about values happened before it became a conversation about conflict.
That clarity does not emerge on its own. It requires conditions — space, support, and the right kind of mirror. Not therapy, not mediation after the fact, but an ongoing infrastructure for the cognitive and relational work that governance actually requires.
This is the layer that has always been missing. And its absence is precisely the mechanism through which $14.7 trillion quietly disappears.
The ego tax is not inevitable. It is the cost of a gap that, for the first time, can be closed.
CURANS is building the missing layer — the first cognitive operating system designed for stewardship, supporting the clarity, conversation, and coherence from which enduring governance emerges.
Source: Julius Baer Family Barometer 2025 (Julius Baer / PwC Switzerland). Williams Group Family Wealth Consulting research.
The operating system for stewardship. Supporting clarity, coherence, and coordination across complex governance and long-term decision contexts.
⊕ Swiss Jurisdiction · Zurich
